Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login
 
Reviews, previews and chuckling and snorting...

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button

February 11th 2009 23:31
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button Brad Pitt as an old man
It's with some reluctance that I write this review, concluding that, no matter what I write, David Fincher's loose adaptation of a F. Scott Fitzgerald short story, "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button", will probably still be applauded and awarded at the Oscars and by audiences.

It's almost inevitable that the film will be awarded, too, as it seems to contain all the most formulaic elements worthy of raising its quantitative qualities: an adequate performance by Brad Pitt, playing the lead character, the look of despair on Cate Blanchett's face, always excellent.

Even further, it's got a gimmick, that Pitt's character ages backward, starting as a wizened old man, then ripening to a virile young man and receding into childhood and infancy.

Complemented with travels around the world, a tragic romance and enough masterful direction from Fincher, who layers the film with ominous foreboding and effortless CGI to render Brad Pitt as an old man.



The problem is, for me, that it's a film lacking in inventiveness, daring or entertainment. Perhaps I'm tired of the concept, having read Martin Amis' "Time's Arrow", a life of a man told backwards, touching on the same threads, and having encountered the gimmick several times since.

Part way through the film, I had the unsettling feeling that I was watching "Forrest Gump" again, this time with Hanks replaced by a CGI Brad Pitt; imagine my complete lack of surprise to find that the screenplay was written by Eric Roth, who did, indeed, write "Forrest Gump", and rehashes much of the same story and tricks, including the method of telling the story from flashbacks, read from a diary.

It's all meticulously crafted, with effort to make the film look incredible. But for what? To tell the story of a man that wanders through life, aging backwards, making no examinations or commentary of such an event. No one seems surprised by Benjamin's affliction, and though he's raised in a black family in the South, there's not even a hint of talk of racism.

The most interesting aspect of the film is the relationship between Benjamin and the love of his life, Daisy. Obviously, she'll get older as he gets younger, and it's this moment that we are excited to see, though the film flies past it, choosing, instead, to show more of Pitt riding a motorcycle off into the distance, seemingly an easy decision to abandon his family.

After two-and-a-half hours, going down the 30 minute stretch, I was on the verge of falling asleep or, even better, faking a seizure to have the pleasure of being restrained and removed from the cinema bound to a stretcher, mouth foaming and shrieking obscenities.


I say: Everyone else seems to like the film, which suggests that I'm the only rotten grape of the whole bunch. If you're in a cinema and there's a commotion, followed by screaming, you'll know that I've had the extreme misfortune of having been forced to watch this a second time. Read a review from Roger Ebert.

See it for: The cast is uniformly excellent, with the captivating Tilda Swinton engaging Benjamin in one act, holding the camera mesmerized.

*this image is from I Watch Stuff!

208
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
23 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Aimzster

February 12th 2009 01:05
hahaha...you remind me of Elaine and her hatred of The English Patient. I actually liked this movie - I thought the first bits were a bit boring but became interesting from the time Benjamin & Daisy got together. I wondered the same thing, why did no one ever pick up on the fact that he was getting younger? Surely, a government agent or a scientist would have wanted to do some experiment on him. But I realised at the end that that wasn't the point. I have to say though I'm quite surprised Blanchett didn't get a nomination.

Comment by Mrs M

February 12th 2009 03:44
Hi Cibby,

It's funny you mention Forrest Gump. I didn't realise it was the same writer. Anyway, Mr M found on youtube (I think) someone put together a Gump/Button mash up.

Meets the love of his life as a child.
Goes to war and becomes a hero.
Befriends a black man.
There's a boat.

All these elements and more. It's quite funny. I haven't seen Button yet. But I have to say that mash up didn't make me want to go in a hurry.

Mr M and I are trying to see as many Oscar films before awards night so we can applaud or criticise accordingly on the night.

Thanks for the review.

Love & stuff
Mrs M

Comment by David O'Connell

February 12th 2009 06:27
I agree for the most part Cibby, though artistically it has a lot of merit, the story is ponderous to an almost painful extent and the novelty - the backwards aging - serves no real purpose nor provide Benjamin with any more of a profound insight into life than anyone else. It's been a weak year for American films if this can be an Oscar contender!

For all that, it's still oddly endearing, just without any real substance!

Comment by Matt Shea

February 12th 2009 06:49
I must say that I haven't seen it and that's because you're not alone Cibbuano - just about every person who's opinion I trust on film has told me it's a bit of a clanger and to stay away.

Comment by Natalie 2

February 12th 2009 08:10
I have to completely agree with you, Cib. I really was bored with this one, and I had high hopes for it.

I thought that Pitt and Blanchett had zero chemistry, I thought it was simply tedious to watch, and I left confused at what all the fuss was about.

Also, I hate it when I watch a film that I just know was destined to be nominated for an Oscar. Like the director was sure of it before the film was done. It felt really pompous and pretentious in a way.

I had the same feeling from Atonement.

Comment by Movie Mall

February 12th 2009 08:42
Hi Cibby, I enjoyed it to an extent .. until it got to the drawn-out final act, and arriving at a point where there had just been way too many 'my name's Forrest, Forrest Gump' moments.
But, well made, with a great setting and fairly well acted yada yada ...
I wrote a bit of a review, which (plug time!) you can readhere.
The link to the very amusing Gump v Button video is here.

Comment by Summer Banks

February 12th 2009 13:54
I am so ready to see this film. I think my kids will love it too! Awesome family movie in a world where violence usually reigns.

Comment by Cibbuano

February 12th 2009 22:07
Aimzster - yeah, I can sympathize with Elaine...

Mrs. M, thanks for reading! I guess you'll need to watch this movie to appreciate the events at the Oscars...

David, I agree completely.. the reverse aging is a gimmick. Not sure if I found it endearing, though...

Matt - trust your instincts on this!

Moviemall - a Gump vs Button mashup seems inevitable. Thanks for the links!

Summer - one the kids will enjoy? Maybe...


Comment by Mr Nice Guy

February 12th 2009 23:36
I'm don't purport to have any insights into the film world, cinematography or the foilbles that go along with being a critic - that said - it appears (for the most) that the garden variety (pay at the box office) patron seems to have enjoyed the film.

. . . in the end movies are about escapism - and if it gives people a chance to escape for 1, 2 or 3 hours from the humdrum and they like it - it's achieved its goal - I think some reviewers (current company excluded) sit atop their ivory tower and forget this sometimes.

OK - so they're paid to have their say - but sometimes its just about losing yourself in the moment - and everyone has a different opiniion of what that moment is.

That said - I'm not about comparing the book - I'm about whether I enjoyed the movie - and frankly yes - I did.

It's not one I'd be scaling walls to see again - but for a couple of hours it managed to take me away from the real world - and that in itself is sometimes enough.

To each their own.

Always a pleasure

Comment by Journeywoman

February 13th 2009 01:22
I enjoyed it as an escape (like MNG said) and I really love Cate Blanchett and Brad Pitt, so these elements were enough for me to derive pleasure from this film. That being said, it's not the kind of movie that I'd want to watch again and again. It's not terrible, just not fantastic like a lot of reviewers (and the Academy) seemed to think. I will be very disappointed if it wins the Oscar.

Comment by Bryn

February 13th 2009 02:11
I'll think I'll give this one a miss now ... Even though I'm a big fan of David Fincher.

I reckon I'm gonna suffer the same fate as you Cibby, with my current slamming review of My Bloody Valentine. I fear everyone else will enjoy it, and not see past the 3-D veneer.

What do you think of the Inglourious Basterds trailer?

Comment by Jake 5

February 13th 2009 06:28
I must say the make-up in the first Picture is good enough for a golden globe! Pitt can act!

Drunbk Rant

Comment by Jason King

February 13th 2009 21:28
I have been waiting for a DVD release of this one Cibby - am yet to see it. I do love everything Cate Blanchett does though - I htink I have some hero worship with her so look forward to seeing it eventually.

Comment by Lilla

February 15th 2009 23:53
Cib,

A friend of mine said this was rubbish, so I left it for the $1 DVD Cheap Tuesday. Nice to see that your review supports my decision.

Lilla ...

Comment by Cibbuano

February 16th 2009 01:33
Lilla, $1 is a good deal, though! And $1 is definitely worth it for a reasonable performance from Pitt, and always a good show from Cate Blanchett.

Comment by JohnDoe

February 26th 2009 23:17
Yep,

You have expressed what I feared for the film and its stellar Director...will make my own mind up on DVD. I loved the novella so I doubt it will be pleasant.

Comment by Cibbuano

February 27th 2009 01:46
JD - good to see you here! Give it a shot, see what you think. Considering your thoughts about Forrest Gump, tho...

Comment by ShaunK

March 6th 2009 15:39
Hey Cib, Hey everyone.

Loved this movie! Thought it was excellent! hahaha Flame away

P.S. and I hate forrest gump

Comment by Cibbuano

March 8th 2009 07:46
Shaun, everyone to their own opinions...

... you didn't like Forrest Gump? What did you like in Benjamin Button, considering the similarities?


Comment by ShaunK

March 8th 2009 09:51
Funny thing is when I was watching B.B. I thought to my self what an interesting example of how it showed up what a shallow film Gump was. The main reason for the gump link was the annoying voice over in the southern accent and that cutesy endearing child like manner both films had using that voice over.

While Gump irritated me with its feeling without thinking sentimental approach, there were some very meditative moments and sequences in Benjamin Button regarding the nature of death and loss, and I dont see the premise as a gimick at all, I see the main character moving further away from death while everyone moves closer to it, there was alot in this film that struck me very deeply and stayed with me. I should probably write a review on it going into more detail.

Comment by Cibbuano

March 8th 2009 22:24
Shaun, I think a review would definitely be justified! I felt the reverse aging was a gimmick because the character didn't seem to really seem to learn or experience anything differently, except for the romance with Daisy.

Comment by Jai

June 2nd 2009 03:21
I agree that this movie was overrated. I don't think it's terrible, but I think in comparison to all the praise and attention it got, it was disappointing. I think the best parts were that old guy talking about being struck by lightning seven times.

And I definitely agree with the point about no one seeming to notice or really care much bout his reverse ageing, in conjunction with him pretty much never commenting on it.

Comment by StarWarsGeek

June 3rd 2009 04:36
Must be age catching up with me, I actually liked this movie. I didn't realise it was written by the same writer as Forrest Gump either until I read this article...

And I liked Forrest Gump.

Didn't even know Pitt was in it. Just watched it for the sake of it. Didn't care about all the unanswered questions, just accepted it as what's necessary for the story to be told.

Fun & easy watch. A good break from my usual fare of extremely intense, stress-inducing, and brain-cell-sapping movies.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
1 Posts
14 Posts
10 Posts
1142 Posts dating from March 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Matt Shea's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Matt Shea
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]