Paranormal Activity 3
October 25th 2011 00:43
by David O’Connell
For the love of things that go bump in the night, a trifecta of spooky home videos has now been assembled with the arrival of a third Paranormal Activity instalment. A former teenager in love with films like Poltergeist (1982) and The Entity (1982), I’m now predisposed, it seems, to looking favourably upon films about malevolent spirits.
Delving into the youth of Katie, the young woman pursued by a force with a personal vendetta in Oren Peli’s box-office smashing original, we’re shuttled back in time via the diminishing glory of VHS to the first signs of activity in her life.
Put together in haste presumably to cash in on the now franchise’s profitability and handed to the directors of excellent but dubious documentary Catfish (2010), Henry Joost and Ariel Schulman, this proves to be the trilogy’s high point to date.
The relative naturalism of the performances is impressive considering the low-grade aesthetic and commercial pressures. The necessity of a man needing to film every moment of his life, even at the most stressful, inappropriate times, may gel less with the same notion of naturalism – but then, we’d have no film without it.
Delving into the youth of Katie, the young woman pursued by a force with a personal vendetta in Oren Peli’s box-office smashing original, we’re shuttled back in time via the diminishing glory of VHS to the first signs of activity in her life.
Put together in haste presumably to cash in on the now franchise’s profitability and handed to the directors of excellent but dubious documentary Catfish (2010), Henry Joost and Ariel Schulman, this proves to be the trilogy’s high point to date.
The relative naturalism of the performances is impressive considering the low-grade aesthetic and commercial pressures. The necessity of a man needing to film every moment of his life, even at the most stressful, inappropriate times, may gel less with the same notion of naturalism – but then, we’d have no film without it.
By now the filmmakers know there's little point in padding the first act with exposition. The noose begins relaxed but is slowly tightened, the chills nimbly spaced. The film’s stroke of genius comes from the use of a camera strapped to an oscillating fan which allows coverage for two rooms. Torturous moments of tension are realised by this deceptively simple employment of the slowly whirring device; every second of anticipation allows visions of what will enter the frame to fester in our imagination.
Katie’s young sister Kristi (Jessica Tyler Brown) is the point of entry, her imaginary friend the initial focus of parental consternation before the weird stuff begins to escalate. There’s a cunning perversion in the way this defensive psychological trait, denoting a common symptom of childhood isolation, gets transformed into an outlet for unleashing the sinister into the lives of all.
The ending is genuinely unnerving, with echoes of Suspiria (1977) and The Blair Witch Project (1999). Many will feel the formula has worn thin already but with so few, if any, genre films able to provoke a nervous laugh, mild heart palpitation or embarrassingly loud swallow out of audiences these days, something this effective deserves to win plaudits for delivering on its expectations.
I say: A very familiar Method of Operation by now but still a hugely enjoyable ride.
See it for: About half a dozen moments of genuine fright.
Katie’s young sister Kristi (Jessica Tyler Brown) is the point of entry, her imaginary friend the initial focus of parental consternation before the weird stuff begins to escalate. There’s a cunning perversion in the way this defensive psychological trait, denoting a common symptom of childhood isolation, gets transformed into an outlet for unleashing the sinister into the lives of all.
The ending is genuinely unnerving, with echoes of Suspiria (1977) and The Blair Witch Project (1999). Many will feel the formula has worn thin already but with so few, if any, genre films able to provoke a nervous laugh, mild heart palpitation or embarrassingly loud swallow out of audiences these days, something this effective deserves to win plaudits for delivering on its expectations.
I say: A very familiar Method of Operation by now but still a hugely enjoyable ride.
See it for: About half a dozen moments of genuine fright.
| 96 |
| Vote |
subscribe to this blog


























Comment by Mountain Fog
Infognito
Screen Trek
QUOTE ME NO QUOTES!
I am relieved to hear this third tasting is an improved formula on the lacklustre last showing!
What I do nto undestand is, why they have not allowed Peli another go...
I was rather annoyed that Paramount had not seen fit to send me an invitation to a preview, hopefully that problem is now fixed.
Nice write up, particularly for not blowing any surprises!
cheers
fog
Comment by gothic
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile
That poster is just wrong though, Oren isn't the director and the tagline screams of bad grammar.
And check out the crazy trailer I've got on my post, not one moment in it actually occurs in the movie!
Glad we're on the same page here mate!
Comment by David O'Connell
Screen Fanatic
Don't worry about missing out on any media screening, Paramount just don't allow the media to see these PA films from what I gather, because of the secretive media campaign/anticipation that surrounds them.
As for Peli I think he's happy to now serve as executive producer and let others do the franchise building - no doubt as he sits back watching the cheques pile up around him!
Comment by Mountain Fog
Infognito
Screen Trek
QUOTE ME NO QUOTES!
no have not seen it yet, must do, am excited that it actually does build tension and whatnot, hopefully without relying too much on the old type of loud noise/smash cut edits.
Anyway, I just do not understand why Peli would want to do that, well, porbably becuase he wasn't given a choice, but, it amazes me that the producers didn't see the value of utilizing a guy who can make a horror film that explodes across the world, and all for 15 grand!!
Shit, if I was grand poobah in Hollywood, I'd be putting him a director's chair quick smart!
Anyway, at least they didn't give it to M Night, now that would have been a mistake, and, so it seems, at least they have learned from the mistakes of PA2.
Okay, I have had my rave for the day...
cheers
fog
P.S. I will put up a post here soon, I'll let you know when I am ready, so I don't post on the same day as you, and where is our Matty Boy these days?
Comment by David O'Connell
Screen Fanatic
Bryn, we're definitely on the same page mate, glad you're one of the sane critics who can appreciate the fun factor of this one.
The poster is a weird one - tried to find one without Peli's name but there seem to be none around. The trailer too, I kept waiting for that Bloody Mary bit the whole film.
Not sure if Peli had the authority to take the reins himself, fog, I haven't read anything about the behind the scenes of this chapter.
No worries about the post mate. Matt has given up 20/20, I'll be continuing to helm this particular ship.
Comment by Mountain Fog
Infognito
Screen Trek
QUOTE ME NO QUOTES!
Gee, and no fare wells?
Or did I miss that?
cheers
fog
Comment by Bower
Chris
Comment by Bower
Comment by David O'Connell
Screen Fanatic
I very much agree Chris, it does the job - and yes, definitely works best in a cinema which is where I've seen all three and enjoyed the effectiveness of them with a crowd around you.
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile
Leaves me feeling a little like a swamp rat.
Comment by Matt Shea
20/20 Filmsight
Yeah, I'll be around, but I'm looking to contact Orble about Dave taking over ownership of the site this week. I'll stay on as a member only.
With my other writing commitments ramping up this year, I don't have the time to contribute the kind of time the site needs. Well, hardly any time, as you've probably noticed.
I'll be round and about, though.
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile