Is the internet really killing American movies?
August 13th 2008 23:33
Film bloggers are rolling their eyes en masse as we sit down, sigh and read Elizabeth Wurtzel's hole-ridden editorial in the Wall Street Journal. It's called:
The Internet is Ruining America's Movies and Music
It must be nice to get to write for the Wall Street Journal, complaining that things aren't as glorious as they used to be? She starts off lamenting on the loss of the outrageous rock star:
Her claim? That illegal downloading of music files and even LEGAL downloads have turned consumers away from the idea of 'the album' and towards singles, which has oriented the industry to produce big hits.
Perhaps. I can only imagine the good aspect of the means of digital distribution: I get to listen to things that I would have never imagined were possible.
For example, Lemon Demon's "Marketland"
Weird enough for me, with a damn catchy chorus.
Or The Best of Bootie, a free album of all the best mashups that hit some of the wildest cities in the Western nations.
Not to mention Jonathan Coulton, who became wildly successful thanks, in part, to the Internet.
But we're here to talk film, and Wurtzel has an opinion on that, too.
Here we get to the crux of Wurtzel's irritation... she longs for a time gone by, when America was the cultural center of the world. Where music and film would flow outward into the greedy hands of the foreign markets, eager to snap up our stars and our contrived Hollywood plots.
From that quote, what are her major gripes? IP violations and piracy, though you could counter that by arguing that people that steal movies are the ones that are unlikely to buy them in the first place. Still, it's one of the only reasonable arguments from the article.
Amazingly, Wurtzel then pins the blame on "old anybody" that makes indie movies with digital equipment, as if this is a terrible thing. You'd be hard pressed to find a film critic that cannot find SOME value in the accessibility of filmmaking, thanks to digital video. While many of us long for the old film days, the low cost of DV has brought us some incredible cinema from around the world.
And it's the 'around the world' part that Wurtzel has a problem with: "International markets have found they favour the locally produced fare" and "Bombay prefers Bollywood to Hollywood". Is Wurtzel so out-of-touch that she find this to be unacceptable? Should we criticize people for wanting to watch movies from their own country?
Karina Longworth at SpoutBlog does a far better job than I at disarming Wurtzel's piece:
Thankfully, the Internet has allowed us to read and discover more about cinema than would be possible otherwise - people like Wurtzel are very interested in controlling the pipes, charging you full prices for movies that you're not that interested in. She laments the stumbling of the American movie industry, but this is the same industry that has, in the space of a month, put out "The Dark Knight", "Tropic Thunder" and "Pineapple Express", movies that will gleefully line the pockets of movie studios with silver.
*this image is from AllNewsPlace.com, and is a still from a hilarious episode of the IT Crowd. Watch it here!
The Internet is Ruining America's Movies and Music
It must be nice to get to write for the Wall Street Journal, complaining that things aren't as glorious as they used to be? She starts off lamenting on the loss of the outrageous rock star:
"The old-fashioned rock star has gone the way of the dodo and the dinosaur. Never again will we have another crazy-as-all-getout Axl Rose, another Jim Morrison who mistakes himself for a poet and has the hypnotic ability to convince a substantial audience it is so, or another Bob Dylan who changes the way a generation sees itself and the world."
Her claim? That illegal downloading of music files and even LEGAL downloads have turned consumers away from the idea of 'the album' and towards singles, which has oriented the industry to produce big hits.
Perhaps. I can only imagine the good aspect of the means of digital distribution: I get to listen to things that I would have never imagined were possible.
For example, Lemon Demon's "Marketland"
Weird enough for me, with a damn catchy chorus.
Or The Best of Bootie, a free album of all the best mashups that hit some of the wildest cities in the Western nations.
Not to mention Jonathan Coulton, who became wildly successful thanks, in part, to the Internet.
But we're here to talk film, and Wurtzel has an opinion on that, too.
"But between Internet piracy, the fact that huge markets like China tend to disobey IP protocols, and a foolhardy tendency of studios to make unwise, profit-sharing deals with bankable talent, movies are not making money the way they used to or the way they should. And now that any old anybody with opposable thumbs can operate a digital camera, international markets have found they favor the locally produced fare over yet another sequel to "Rush Hour." Bombay prefers Bollywood to Hollywood."
Here we get to the crux of Wurtzel's irritation... she longs for a time gone by, when America was the cultural center of the world. Where music and film would flow outward into the greedy hands of the foreign markets, eager to snap up our stars and our contrived Hollywood plots.
From that quote, what are her major gripes? IP violations and piracy, though you could counter that by arguing that people that steal movies are the ones that are unlikely to buy them in the first place. Still, it's one of the only reasonable arguments from the article.
Amazingly, Wurtzel then pins the blame on "old anybody" that makes indie movies with digital equipment, as if this is a terrible thing. You'd be hard pressed to find a film critic that cannot find SOME value in the accessibility of filmmaking, thanks to digital video. While many of us long for the old film days, the low cost of DV has brought us some incredible cinema from around the world.
And it's the 'around the world' part that Wurtzel has a problem with: "International markets have found they favour the locally produced fare" and "Bombay prefers Bollywood to Hollywood". Is Wurtzel so out-of-touch that she find this to be unacceptable? Should we criticize people for wanting to watch movies from their own country?
Karina Longworth at SpoutBlog does a far better job than I at disarming Wurtzel's piece:
"Though Wurtzel laments a de-emphasis on “talent” in pop music, she has not a single qualitative statement to make about a single contemporary film––she’s simply concerned that studios are making more money off their back catalogs than new releases, and that foreign territories “have found they favor the locally produced fare over yet another sequel to Rush Hour.”
Thankfully, the Internet has allowed us to read and discover more about cinema than would be possible otherwise - people like Wurtzel are very interested in controlling the pipes, charging you full prices for movies that you're not that interested in. She laments the stumbling of the American movie industry, but this is the same industry that has, in the space of a month, put out "The Dark Knight", "Tropic Thunder" and "Pineapple Express", movies that will gleefully line the pockets of movie studios with silver.
*this image is from AllNewsPlace.com, and is a still from a hilarious episode of the IT Crowd. Watch it here!
| 111 |
| Vote |
Subscribe to this blog

















Comment by Cibbuano
Hunt Famous
Orble Post of the Day
Fat Cult
Techbreak
Comment by Damo
That being said we all miss the old steam engine days, where we were free and happier than we are today. However back then people missed the horse buggy days.
The new reality is that the Internet exists and people make choices. It would be extremely condescending to call people stupid because they choose another type of music than what you consider life changing.
Comment by Cibbuano
Hunt Famous
Orble Post of the Day
Fat Cult
Techbreak
..I've heard that a group of prominent musicians are suing the record companies. After all, the RIAA uses the reason that we're 'stealing from the artists' as discouragement. Well, the artists haven't received any of that money!
Comment by Cibbuano
Hunt Famous
Orble Post of the Day
Fat Cult
Techbreak
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile
I am slowly and steadily collecting every one of my favourite movies on DVD. I love the process; the comparing of editions and finally the acquisition. I nearly have all 100 of my favourite films (yes, I actually have a list, I'm that much of a cinephile). Plus another 400 DVDs of other movies that float my boat.
So I might not be going out to the cinema as often as I used to, but I'm still supporting the industry.
Comment by Nathan 1
Comment by Cibbuano
Hunt Famous
Orble Post of the Day
Fat Cult
Techbreak
Yes, studios are going for bankable options, which is why we're treated to horrible remakes, reimaginings and sequels. I'm sure the Australian film industry would love it if Australia became a little less US-polarized in the cinemas, though...
Comment by Cibbuano
Hunt Famous
Orble Post of the Day
Fat Cult
Techbreak
I'm sure you've pumped in more than your share of revenue for the film industry!
I don't really want to collect DVDs, though... I still find them to be inconvenient... the stupid opening warning titles, the terrible DVD menus.
No, I prefer to rip my DVDs to a file and store it on a media center - then it's accessible, immediately!
Comment by Clint Emry
Strategy and Solutions
the situation becomes very convoluted.
Comment by Nathan 1
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile
Call me old-fahsioned.
Purist.
Die hard romantic.
I have to have the hardcopy with the packaging and the extra features.
Just as I can't stand music as MP3 files, apart from the convenience of having them on an MP3 player. I love vinyl. I love handling vinyl.
To have movies stored as files on a computer depresses the hell out of me.
Most DVDs I have don't have bullshit trailers at the beginning. There can be a little shite to wade through. But I tolerate it.
Comment by Cibbuano
Hunt Famous
Orble Post of the Day
Fat Cult
Techbreak
nathan, ah, prozac nation... I've heard of it. I don't know if I'll read it after this nasty article...
bryn, I can sympathize... I don't enjoy having MP3s either, I prefer vinyl. My records are in Canada, and the last time I saw them, it was a moment of pure joy.
DVDs, though, are hardly the same... they're a convenient form of storing movies, no different than storing them as files.
If I started collecting film reels, that might push me over the edge - I'd be down with that nonsense...
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile
Comment by OnlineWriter
Online Writing Jobs
He's got the most amazing vinyl collection on earth I think too haha.
I'm not so picky.
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile
Comment by Miswanderlust
Killer Beats
Ramble On
Hipnotherapy