Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

20/20 Filmsight - Film Criticism by David O'Connell

 
Film Criticism by David O'Connell

Blame

June 8th 2011 03:28
by David O’Connell





Blame is one of the less distinguished local films to hit cinema screens in recent times. A tedious, single location drama that tries to extract tensions from a revenge attack that goes awry, Blame is the work of writer/director Michael Henry.

Filmed in Western Australia, the film begins with a teacher, Bernard (Damian de Montemas), returning to his remote home in the woods. Within double-quick time he's beset upon by a quartet of attackers in balaclavas who proceed to tie him up and drug him with what is supposed to be a lethal dosage.

This plan of revenge has been concocted by Cate (Kestie Morassi), Nick (Simon Stone) who is the group’s vocal leader, the wimpy Anthony (Ashley Zukerman) and Natalie (Sophie Lowe). Waiting in the nearby woods for the onerous task to be completed is the sullen John (Mark Leonard Winter) who seems to be pulling the strings at first but apparently doesn’t have the stomach for direct confrontation.

The playing field changes however when Anthony stupidly leaves his mobile phone behind, necessitating a return to the scene of the crime. Naturally, the body has vanished in their absence. But the incapacitated Bernard is no Michael Myers, he hasn’t strayed far with those force-fed drugs still percolating in his bloodstream; confused and disoriented he stumbles about with little clue as to the group’s motivation. They tie him up again, but now what?

Pieces of the puzzle are gradually coaxed out into the light by Henry’s underwhelming screenplay which tries to manufacture compelling reasons for this concerted effort at delivering a dish best served cold. But grey lines of morality are created, throwing questions of how to deal with the undead victim and where the guilt really lies into the open.





Conflict naturally ensues with a consensus unable to be reached. Resentment swells, half-measures are considered, discarded; a definitive solution drifts further from view with each passing minute, creating complications that can’t be ignored. Toss the requisite discovery of a firearm and a persistent delivery man into the mix and you have contrivances piling on top of one another like old newspapers.

The acting is passable for the most part given the generic, uninspiring dialogue fed into the performers mouths. Morassi and Stone, at least, look like their hearts are in it, but Lowe, so luminescent in Beautiful Kate (2009), comes across as vapid and blank. I remember thinking Winter looked eerily like Daniel Day-Lewis with a beard in the superb Van Diemen's Land (2009). Well, without the beard, he doesn't. Not really.

Blame (2011) stagnates just as it should be hitting its stride; the limitations of a single location kill any chance at diversifying the perspectives – something that feels desperately needed by the half-way point as the narrative gasps for air, faltering with each uninteresting revelation before reaching a final, inexorable creative impasse.




I say: An underwhelming thriller that feels like it's going through the motions for much of its length.

See it for: The foothills, the trees, a well-oiled shotgun............a cute barking dog? I'm struggling here..........




Blame opens in limited release around Australia on Thursday, June 16.


*This image is from greenguideday.blogspot






52
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
6 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Mountain Fog

June 8th 2011 06:52
WOW!

Dave, I can hardly wait...

I'm always looking for a film that has a cute barking dog...and as for a well oiled shotgun...what a fabulous metaphor, what dastardly subtext doth it convey...double entendre anyone?

It shytes me how many awful, boring, humdrum products are still being financed in Oz...really...

cheers

fog

Comment by David O'Connell

June 9th 2011 03:50
A project as painfully mediocre as this definitely is a step back fog but we shouldn't be too harsh, the general standard of local films has risen greatly in the last 2 or 3 years. There'll always be duds and this is certainly one of them - though amazingly some critics found positive things to say about it. Maybe I saw the wrong film!

Comment by Mountain Fog

June 9th 2011 10:06
Dave,

there may have been some examples of improvement in Oz films in the last few years, but those are the exception I suspect.

Also, the closed attitude towards whose films get up, and who gets onto crews is much worse than when I worked in the industry, as told to me just recently, some techs are not bothering with Oz anymore and work overseas for the most part, which is a great shame.

I have yet to review an Oz number I have just watched last week, (DVD release only) as it was just so awful...

"Maybe I saw the wrong film!"

hahaaa!!

The 'go soft' on criticising Oz product, by some major organs at the very least, is very apparent. We need more brutal honesty, but fair criticism, which hopefully will stimulate the decision makers to re-evaluate what and who they give the green light to.

Some in the industry believe it would be better off without any government support, because there is a tacit agreement that certain projects are not to be funded over more politically correct projects, which do not necessarily put bums on seats.

For example, I doubt Your Highness would get past the first evaluation process for funding...and I am not suggesting YH is a worthy product, but, it is perfectly aimed at the target audience and is raking in the money.

To my mind, there needs to be a balance to keep our industry in existence; between the intellectual and artistic fodder and the more visceral and base humoured products the masses so love.

cheers

fog


]

Comment by Anonymous

June 12th 2011 06:46
I see a lot of movies and, though I wanted and expected to really like it, found Blame just woeful. In fact, I am nominating Blame for "dog of the year". Surely there won't be a movie worse than this one over the next 7 months.
The screenplay is laughable. In fact, the preview audience laughed at many of the scenes which we were meant to find anything but funny. The acting was generally weak. The dialogue was often awful. Exposition was clumsy.
Comments I heard and agree with included: "Like a high school production"; "First year film school stuff in every way"; "These actors need to go back to WAAPA or wherever they studied"; "How could Film Australia fund that crap?"; "How did those involved think that that screenplay was ready? The script needed several re-drafts".
I promised myself that I would tell my friends ASAP so that they won't waste good money on such a dreadful film.

Comment by David O'Connell

June 16th 2011 05:34
No doubt about it fog, so many of our best craftspeople, both in front of and behind the camera are disappearing overseas. The Americans are very quick to snap up talented people from down under.

The 'go soft' on Australian films was certainly in evidence again last night on At the Movies - both David and Margaret unbelievably gave this meagre piece of cinema a wrap. Margaret's comment that it was "edge of the seat" stuff gave me the best laugh I've had all week! Seriously, that's ridiculous. The writing and acting are sub-standard, the direction fairly pedestrian.

I suggest that most people - ordinary cinemagoers - with no stake in the outcome will respond to it much the way that Anon did. Anon, I think you were fairly spot on.

Comment by Mountain Fog

June 16th 2011 12:05
Hi Dave,
yeah, I saw that too, and really wondered, after having previously read your review, what on earth they had dropped beofre they saw it??!!

I was similarly dismayed by their reaction to Burke and Hare...

I can understand them (but not agree with) gilding the lilly for Oz product, but geeez...they are really off the boil on some things...like HOP...that was unadulterated crap, yet I seem to remember they saying it was okay...

Anyhoo...back to my screenplay..

cheers

fog

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
4 Posts
6 Posts
10 Posts
1303 Posts dating from March 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

David O'Connell's Blogs

60692 Vote(s)
2120 Comment(s)
529 Post(s)
Moderated by David O'Connell
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]