Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login
 
Reviews, previews and chuckling and snorting...

Black Swan

January 18th 2011 08:20
by Matt Shea
Natalie Portman Black Swan

Black Swan is like a conjurer’s trick. It dances in front of you, it moves and shakes, offers distractions and throws up red herrings. And it’s so effective that when all is said and done you’re not really sure what happened. All you know is that, at some point, you’ve been deceived.

Not that Black Swan keeps an entirely straight face throughout its running time. It’s built upon caricature and cliché, and almost burns out audience goodwill with a clutch of risible scenes. But this is an easy film to forgive given some of the craft on display – it’s just a case of whether or not it should be forgiven.

At the centre of the threadbare plot is Natalie Portman’s Nina. An emotionally frigid member of a New York dance company’s corps de ballet, Nina’s opportunity comes when artistic director, Thomas (Vincent Cassel) looks to reinvigorate the business by letting go his aging lead, Beth (Joan Cusack Winona Ryder), and staging a cutting edge production of Swan Lake. After a series of auditions, Nina gets the part.

And so rolls the film’s major plot hole: why would Thomas – desperate to save his ailing company – pick Nina, a dancer who he chastises for not being capable of embracing the duality of the central role? Still, this like everything else is quickly folded into the film’s shape shifting shadow, the audience barely getting a chance to raise a hand and ask the question.

The whole thing rushes along thus, as if the filmmakers were so convinced of the quality of their work that they didn’t think about whether it would hold together under close examination. Nina’s delicate personality is of course put under increasing strain by the lead role, and as the first night approaches she’s in danger of unravelling entirely.

The film’s claustrophobic dedication to its lead character allows director Darren Aronofsky to have a lot of fun with her deteriorating mental state. There are plenty of fantastic freak-out moments, even if some of the more audacious stunts elicit a laugh rather than a yelp.

Aronofsky is coming off his sublime work in The Wrestler, but that film had just one writer whereas Black Swan features three (Mark Heyman, Andres Heinz and John J. McLaughlin), none of whom worked together, and none of whom managed to flesh out a screenplay of any real depth. The Wrestler’s reflective nature seemed to encourage Aronofsky to dial down his own melodramatic tendencies, but in Black Swan they’re back out front, quickly chewing through a film they're meant to enhance.



All the jerkiness, off kilter framing and ripcord editing might have worked on a film of more substance, but combined with the well-prepared set pieces they are the substance, Black Swan’s weaknesses in the area of character being a hurdle too high to jump. Whether you laugh or shit your pants at the invention on display, you’ll leave the cinema barely caring about the caricatures Black Swan attempts to sell as real people.

Nina is the biggest problem, something that – like so much in the film – is cleverly disguised, this time by a bravura performance from Portman. Portman hauls and heaves but Nina is just too slight for you to ultimately care about her. Thomas too is a one-dimensional tyrant, and the less said about the over-egged Beth the better. Nina’s mother also checks in for the clichéd treatment, although she’s another who benefits from the actress tasked with playing her (Barbara Hershey). With all this neurosis and venom on display, Mila Kunis performs the important function of allowing the audience into the film, her take on Lily, an open-minded ballerina from San Francisco, being as good for us as she is for Nina (kinda).

But that’s Black Swan: plenty of craft and not much art. It does so many things so well – the ballet rituals, the dance sequences, the Gondry-like special effects, Clint Mansell’s fulsome score – and then just recklessly shakes it up and pours it out on the pan, the result being impressive but flavourless. There’s no doubt this is an enjoyable piece of cinema, but Black Swan is more pulpy melodrama than deep psychological thriller, and should be approached with that in mind.


I say: You’d be better off seeing a production of the actual ballet. Black Swan is able filmmaking, but lacks the depth required to make it a true classic.

See it for: The little things. There’s so much proficiency on display in a technical sense that the film is certainly never uninteresting.



*This image is from About.com

82
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
18 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Mountain Fog

January 18th 2011 10:17
this only peaks my interest even more Matt, after reading Dave's take on it, and so I must wddle off, and piroette into a cinema asap and check it out!

cheers

fog

Comment by Bryn

January 18th 2011 21:58
Have to disagree strongly with you on this one Matt. But it would be boring if we agreed on everything.
Black Swan was about the dangers of caricature, about that precarious balance and the edge that the larger-than-life emphasis placed upon operatic performances pushes its dancers off and over.
You can't defend The Wrestler for being any less cliched than Black Swan, if you're attacking Black Swan for being cliched. The Wrestler is riddled with characters we've seen time and time again; the ageing star, the angry daughter, the damaged angel ...
Of course there's melodrama in Black Swan, it's about young ballet dancers competing! But I firmly champion the movie as an instant modern classic, that will reward on repeat viewings. But hell, I love Dario Argento and Roman Polanski, two major influences, and they've always been criticised for style over substance.

Comment by Matt Shea

January 18th 2011 23:26
Yeah, I'll be interested to read your thoughts, Fog.

I definitely see what you're saying, Bryn, but the lack of character was the thing that crippled it for me. The Wrestler was built on archetypes, but the filmmakers filled them out, made them real characters and avoided cliche by offering very little in the way of redemption.

But hell, I love Dario Argento and Roman Polanski, two major influences, and they've always been criticised for style over substance.

Ha, true, but when Polanski teams up with a good writer he is peerless.

Comment by Always Eighteen

January 19th 2011 03:44
I love the ending of this

Comment by Matt Shea

January 19th 2011 03:50
Thanks for reading, AE. I thought the ending was pretty predictable, although that final half hour certainly is hair-raising.

Comment by Bryn

January 19th 2011 04:48
Gerard Brach and Polanski together have penned some superb screenplays; Cul-de-Sac being the best.

Comment by David O'Connell

January 19th 2011 05:51
Fair enough on your points too Matt, I do think the first half is a bit iffy in places but the overwhelming third act is just hard to put out of your mind, it's so damn effective. Three or four really good creepy moments too. Mansell's re-interpretation of Swan Lake is sublime, with some great original touches as well. Getting stuck into the CD now.

Comment by Matt Shea

January 19th 2011 06:14
I've never seen Cul-de-Sac - my favourite Polanski film is still China Town: the Polanski - Bob Towne tee-up is hard to beat.

Comment by Matt Shea

January 19th 2011 06:36
Thanks for reading, Dave. Yeah, Mansell's work is great, although I found it a little too much at times. Thought you might be get your hands on the CD .

Comment by Jason King

January 19th 2011 20:44
Ouch Matt - I have to disagree - I think this is Aronofsky's best film equal to Requiem for a Dream. I just loved and thought it the film of 2010. Mansell's music was spectacular and I am thinking we saw a different film But then again I am sure you will be a lover of True Grit and I was massively disappointed. Arrggh - the taste of different people

Comment by Bryn

January 20th 2011 00:50
Matt, you need to see more Polanksi! Chinatown is good, but it's very Hollywood too. I much prefer his UK/European movies; Repulsion, Cul-de-Sac, Fearless Vampire Killers, MacBeth, The Tenant, Bitter Moon. But then I'm less impressed with a water-tight screenplay than I am with mastery of what Polanski calls the most important part of a movie: atmosphere.

Comment by Matt Shea

January 20th 2011 02:05
Yes, yes, Jason - I am a lunatic . The thing is, I'm not that big a fan of Requiem either.

I've seen most of his Bryn: Repulsion, The Tenant and Bitter Moon are all good flicks, but there's a synergy between Towne and Polanski on Chinatown that's hard to beat. I wouldn't really describe it as Hollywood either - it's pretty subversive, at least in its tendency to ignore formula. But just about every Polanksi film is enjoyable on some level because, as you say, he's such a big believer in atmosphere.

Comment by Bryn

January 20th 2011 03:56
I'd agree that Polanski brought a Euro sensibility to Chinatown. His intention was to shoot a period movie using the most modern, but unpretentious techniques. And agreed that the ending isn't Hollywood, but it's the setting that is so intrinsically American. As tight as Towne's screenplay is I still prefer the synergy between Brach and Polanski.

Comment by The Travelling Fairy Dancer

January 20th 2011 04:16
I haven't yet seen the movie - but, being a dancer, I'll no doubt form a biased opinion! What I can comment on is this cleverly crafted review. I was transfixed - which has more to do with the writing than the movie info. Thanks for the entertainment.

Comment by Matt Shea

January 20th 2011 04:25
Fair enough, Bryn.

Thanks TFD - glad you enjoyed the write-up. Being a dancer, I'm sure you'll get something out of it. My family has a bit of a ballet bent and I'm having a hard time convincing my mother not go and see this, given the racy content.

Comment by Bryn

January 20th 2011 04:34
"racy" ...
My 11-year-old ballet freak niece is desperate to see it. She begins point this year.

Comment by Matt Shea

January 20th 2011 04:36
Oh man... shield her, Uncle Bryn!

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
1 Posts
3 Posts
3 Posts
1282 Posts dating from March 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Matt Shea's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Matt Shea
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]